|
|
Post by andreaisabbbw on Jul 28, 2011 13:15:53 GMT -5
Dinner for Schmucks. It just...no. And Lost in Austen. It was a TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE film/miniseries/whatever. I'm a total Austen fan and I can't believe I sat through that. I lasted one episode in to Lost in Austen and gave up. Interesting idea, horrible execution. I kept watching because I thought it was going to get better (it didn't). I completely agree, it was an interesting idea, but they went about it all wrong. It felt like they were writing it as they went along because certain turn of events made me think, "What? How did that just happen?" |
|
rayyychul
Armadillo
On ne voit bien qu'avec le c?ur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
Posts: 159
|
Post by rayyychul on Jul 28, 2011 19:01:31 GMT -5
The Switch.
Last I checked, romantic comedies were supposed to be, well, romantic and comedic. This was neither.
|
|
|
|
Post by andreaisabbbw on Jul 28, 2011 21:31:21 GMT -5
The Switch. Last I checked, romantic comedies were supposed to be, well, romantic and comedic. This was neither. True. It was a little cute, though. The little boy was my favorite. |
|
rayyychul
Armadillo
On ne voit bien qu'avec le c?ur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
Posts: 159
|
Post by rayyychul on Jul 29, 2011 0:12:44 GMT -5
The Switch. Last I checked, romantic comedies were supposed to be, well, romantic and comedic. This was neither. True. It was a little cute, though. The little boy was my favorite. It was such an adorable idea, but I was so disappointed when I saw it! Maybe I had too high hopes for it, haha. The little boy was adorable, though, you're right! |
|
|
|
Post by tosney on Jul 29, 2011 22:19:26 GMT -5
Last I checked, romantic comedies were supposed to be, well, romantic and comedic. This was neither. This makes me think of Notting Hill. It's supposed to be a romantic comedy, but the whole thing is just plain awkward. Painfully. |
|
